Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve log managers #193

Closed
jpajuelo opened this issue May 24, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Improve log managers #193

jpajuelo opened this issue May 24, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@jpajuelo
Copy link
Collaborator

With regard to the log managers, there are some features that should be improved. These would be the following:

  • Every log has a title, a description and a creation date, that said the title should be short and the description should be an explanation detailed of the issue and also show solutions.
  • Improve the style of the logs.
  • Improve the cycles because they are not working very well.
  • Improve the hierarchy of the log managers because sometimes some issues are repeated.
  • It could be interesting when you see the window menu of the logs, in the first instance you only see the logs of the current cycle.
  • Add logs of type 'success'. Because some info logs should be success logs.
  • It would make no sense to create more classes of LogManager since the LogWindowMenu should be more editable. For example, the title of the window menu should be a constructor's argument.
@aarranz aarranz changed the title Refactor the log managers Improve log managers May 25, 2016
@aarranz aarranz closed this as completed Nov 25, 2016
@aarranz
Copy link
Member

aarranz commented Nov 25, 2016

Too much things to be tackled in a single ticket...

Also, some of the points are not documented enough (e.g the "Improve the cycles because they are not working very well." has no references to what is not working well...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants