Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I tested on your script it working well, but any way to batch delete request overseerr/jellyseerr? #4

Open
ericvlog opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@ericvlog
Copy link

Because it will add alot of content inside request.

thanks.

@Woahai321
Copy link
Owner

Hey, thanks for reaching out, glad to hear it is working well for you.

As it stands currently the script searches for the title and requests it, i suppose we could add something so the user can input the list id and instead it do the oposite, search for the title and delete anything thats been requested and that isn't now available.

I can look to implement some functionality like this if this would suffice, unless you have another route or outcome you are looking to achieve. I'm busy with work and studies this Q but look to make this a v1.0 before xmas.

Any other suggestions you think should make it to the v1.0?

@Woahai321 Woahai321 added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Oct 15, 2024
@ericvlog
Copy link
Author

it quite important able to batch delete request because all list is sync to overseerr it will become huge request.

at sct/overseerr#548 on last comment it say can use DELETE FROM media_request WHERE id IN (SELECT media_request.id FROM media LEFT JOIN media_request ON media.id = media_request.mediaId WHERE media.status=5);

but I tested seem is unsuccessful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants