Enhance Query Block Pagination with Unique Identifiers or Post Type Parameters for Improved Multi-Block Management #60938
Labels
[Block] Query Loop
Affects the Query Loop Block
[Status] Duplicate
Used to indicate that a current issue matches an existing one and can be closed
[Type] Bug
An existing feature does not function as intended
What problem does this address?
I'm currently facing a challenge with the Gutenberg Query block in WordPress where the pagination mechanism doesn't distinguish between multiple Query blocks on the same page. When I have multiple Query blocks each set to display different post types or categories, using the pagination on one block unexpectedly affects all other Query blocks on the page. This behavior occurs because the pagination URL does not include a unique identifier or the post type being queried, leading to all Query blocks reacting to the same pagination controls.
This issue becomes particularly frustrating when designing complex pages that require multiple content sections with independent navigation. Users can become confused if navigating through posts in one section changes the displayed posts in another, which disrupts the user experience and content organization.
What is your proposed solution?
I propose enhancing the Query block's pagination feature to include a unique identifier or the post type in the pagination URL parameters. For example, appending a post_type=XX parameter to the pagination links can ensure that each Query block's pagination controls only affect the block with the respective post type or identifier.
This improvement would allow each Query block to operate independently on pages with multiple content types, significantly improving content management and navigation on complex pages. It would also align with WordPress's core philosophy of being user-friendly and adaptable to various content display needs.
By implementing this feature, Gutenberg would provide better support for developers and designers who are looking to create more dynamic and user-centric sites, enhancing the overall functionality of the block editor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: