Presenting data outside the WHG platform

[rmostern]

Inquiry from Elton Barker: "I have a question, relating to some pilot testing I'm currently doing with the new RecogitoStudio. As you may be aware, the WHG now appears as an option for people using the new RS geotagger. This is great and will provide so much better coverage than the old Recogito, but there's also a problem. Having chosen WHG as my gazetteer, I now get multiple options for the place information in the document I'm annotating. Of course, this is no surprise, given the multiple records WHG has. However, as a user of RS, I'd want a little bit more information about the different WHG records for a place, in order to choose the one most appropriate "gazetteer" for the document that I'm working on. This is a question that's already getting into the weeds: but the general point that I would like to see addressed is the issue of pipelines. Not only whether WHG can be used in other tools (clearly it can), but how can its data be presented in a way that makes sense outside of the WHG platform."

[docuracy]

I've added a note about this to #296.