Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

是否有必要移除旧的XTLS流控 #1596

Closed
FranzKafkaYu opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

是否有必要移除旧的XTLS流控 #1596

FranzKafkaYu opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@FranzKafkaYu
Copy link
Contributor

如题,旧的XTLS流控原本为VLESS的专属,后来Xray将Trojan协议改造使其也可以使用这些相应的流控。而现在xtls-rprx-vision流控属于VLESS专属,如果要完全移除老的流控,Trojan也无法再使用相应的流控。

考虑到国内在国内旧的流控确实不再安全,但是在其他地方也许还有一些存在的现实意义(即使是增加流量分析的样本量)。如果不移除旧的流控,是否可以从GUI上做相应提示?

@FranzKafkaYu
Copy link
Contributor Author

还忘了群友反馈的一个情况,IOS目前没有适配xtls-rprx-vision流控的客户端,过早移除老的流控可能会有一些不便。

@RPRX
Copy link
Member

RPRX commented Feb 3, 2023

XTLS/REALITY 和 XTLS/Go 一换一

XTLS Vision 在任何方面都比旧版 XTLS 强,只是内层 TLSv1.2 时不裸奔,而 TLSv1.2 已经越来越少了,所以保留旧版的必要性不大

其实仔细想想,你就会发现 XTLS Vision 没有必要支持 Trojan 了,以前支持是为了同端口,现在和它同端口会直接 get blocked
假如说是想用 Trojan+Vision,不和原版 Trojan 共存的那种,那就更没有意义了,因为不如直接用原生的 VLESS+Vision

@RPRX
Copy link
Member

RPRX commented Feb 3, 2023

还忘了群友反馈的一个情况,IOS目前没有适配xtls-rprx-vision流控的客户端,过早移除老的流控可能会有一些不便。

我觉得如果确实需要用旧版 XTLS,可以先不升至 v1.8.0,v1.7.x 的小版本就是为这种情况准备的

@FranzKafkaYu
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK.

@alireza1023
Copy link

I also forgot a situation reported by the group friends. Currently, IOS does not have a client that adapts to xtls-rprx-vision flow control. It may be inconvenient to remove the old flow control too early.

now ShadowRocket supports it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants