Tun Support

[APT-ZERO]

Hello
Desktop clients needs Xray-core to support Tun
Do you have any plan to support it?

[Fangliding]

dup

[PoneyClairDeLune]

Use transproxies. TUN is less performant than transparent proxies anyway, unless you need to also handle packets other than TCP and UDP.

[RPRX]

我觉得主要是 Windows 和 macOS 需要 Tun，Linux 上不如透明代理，话说 macOS 上有透明代理吗

[Fangliding]

这里似乎已经变成许愿井了 issue区不是干这个的。。。
请不要再在这里发送无用的消息

[omid-official]

Can we use this dependency?
https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-tun

[mmmray]

@omid-official I think GPL is not right to add to xray. There is some GPL code in xray, but it is historical, and the author themselves added it. (otherwise, I am sure adding some dependencies to xray for this feature is fine)

[omid-official]

Can we use this dependency? https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-tun

Sing-Tun is approved by Xray devs at #1814 and is advised to use because it's not wise to reinvent the wheel

I am a novice regarding licenses and do not know what terms and conditions each of them has, but as mmmray mentioned, the GPL license has stricter rules compared to the MPL license.

[Fangliding]

Please stop that. We will not use it

[deepsm0ke]

I think TUN is really good and practical( not only for Win or MacOS, for all platforms ), and at least for the following reason, it needs to be added:

TUN can cover all network traffic, including traffic from non-browser software, apps, and various protocols. Additionally, you can block WebRTC STUN later to prevent the exposure of the real IPs( Local + Public)!
With TUN, all traffic is routed through the tunnel(vNIC), which reduces the likelihood of requests being identified and blocked.

[EarlVadim]

A proxy without the TUN mode is not serious. They write correctly that not all traffic goes through the browser.
In addition, at the moment there is no solution for the TUN mode with the XHTTP protocol.
And such a solution will not appear soon. (((
Something needs to be done about this.