-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About the performance #4
Comments
I checked every steps again and it works fine for me. Did you generate merged images by the code Composition_code.py provided in Adobe dataset and follow their image order test_bg_names.txt/test_fg_names.txt? |
Thanks for your excelent job. I use your pretrained model gca-dist and test in composition-1k dataset as hengshan123's talk. here is my result: ['model-600238_1920_13.png'] 8.949408203125 I merged Adobe dataset following huochaitiantang's sciprt. (https://github.com/huochaitiantang/pytorch-deep-image-matting/blob/master/tools/composite.py) |
I tried this script and I can reproduce your result. Maybe hengshan123 also used this one. But it is different from how Adobe merge their Composition-1k testing set. So don't use this code to merge your data for testing. |
Thank you for the excellent work, i use your pretrained model gca-dist and test in composition-1k dataset, but i get the sad, mse like bellow, it's a little different from the paper
[03-12 15:15:46] INFO: TEST NUM: 1000
[03-12 15:15:46] INFO: MSE: 0.010313104958540355
[03-12 15:15:46] INFO: SAD: 37.83985428515623
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: