Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proxmox and OMR poor Performance ... #3335

Closed
vinceducat opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 14 comments
Closed

Proxmox and OMR poor Performance ... #3335

vinceducat opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 14 comments

Comments

@vinceducat
Copy link

Expected Behavior

Have OMR router on a proxmox pve 8.2 with performance as in direct connection to the ISP Box

Current Behavior

throught proxmox and OMR as guest, i have half of the nominal speed on ma connexion "Fiber"

direct link from PromoxPVE to freebox 1.6Gb/s => 200Mo/s
from OMR itself 80-100Mo/s :-(

Specifications

Promox PVE machine : ms-01 miniforum with i9 -13 proc 96Go ram and 3 ssd m.2 in zfs
vmbr0 is link to 10Gb/s port
vmbr1 is link to the Freebox at 2.5Gb/b port

Freebox Pop with 2.5Gb port connect to proxmox with also 2.5Gb/s port
Guest OMR VM on proxmox have 2 NIC virtio 1 for lan

needs help to know il it is a problem of OMR or proxmox ...

  • OpenMPTCProuter version: 0.60
  • OpenMPTCProuter VPS version: 0.1310
  • OpenMPTCProuter VPS provider: milkywan
  • OpenMPTCProuter platform: x86_64 as guest on promox -->
@Ysurac
Copy link
Owner

Ysurac commented May 7, 2024

Did you can try e1000 instead of virtio ?

@Scaff31
Copy link

Scaff31 commented May 8, 2024

image

Which offer do you use ?

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

@Ysurac yes a try E1000 and virtio.

@Scaff31 i have my own vps on milkywan not link to mega or giga offer.

@Ysurac et scaff31 ... after many test the problème that in fact Freebox Pop "filter" ipv4 traffic versus ip v6.

i done direct connection beetween a computer with a 2.5Gb/s and the freebox pop link on the 2.5Gb/s port...

the result in ipv4 is 700/300 and 2000/700 in ipv 6.... :-( try with different machine et serveur of test.

@Ysurac is it possible in omr router to use only ipv6 fromm OMR router to the OMR Vps ? => i would try to bypass the problem

@Ysurac
Copy link
Owner

Ysurac commented May 8, 2024

Yes it's possible, less tested for now but should work.

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

@Ysurac do you have some sample for setup omr router .. in the wizard ?

vps is milkywan i have ipv4 adresse
isp is Free with freebox pop.. (FTTH) (can i let freebox in router mode or put it i bridge mode ?)

you will welcome if you have some tips/samples ;-)

do i need to check some thinks on the omr vps side

@Ysurac
Copy link
Owner

Ysurac commented May 8, 2024

Enable IPv6 via the "Advanced Settings" checkbox, and set an IPv6 address.
OMR also support IPv4 and IPv6 for same server and will use both and can even aggregate IPv6 connections with IPv4 connections with kernel 6.6 on snapshot.
Snapshot solve some issues with IPv6, there is still some that will be solved soon.

On VPS side, IPv6 need to be working before VPS install script is run.

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

vinceducat commented May 8, 2024

@Ysurac at this time :
ipv6 is enable by the check box and the address is fd58:8a43:2f89::/48

for vps i have ipv4 address of the milkywan vps do i add the ipv6 beside or remplace it ?

as i read i'm a the official release ...with kernel 6.1 .. so no change that ipv6 link from OMR to VPS work with out using the 6.6 snapshot ?

do i change also the version on the VPS ?
(i dont want so because of me last problem, during past test... VPS fall down, and i have to contact milky to solve th probleme, i dont want to make to disturb much more the milky's guys :-()

in the wizard and "wan1" part witch is the link to the FreeBox Pop, with a dedicate interface, witch adresse do i need to add ?

ps: du to the limitation i fine in the freeboxPop (ipv4) filter, my goal is to only pass ipv6 traffic beetwin OMR ans Freeebox POP.

but i need ipv4 and ipv6 be route by OMR could you think it is possible ?

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

@Ysurac i try to make test with on new vps on hetner on debian 12 with snapshot version 0.61 6.6 but i have this error
--2024-05-08 20:56:17-- https://dl.xanmod.org/archive.key
Resolving dl.xanmod.org (dl.xanmod.org)... 2a06:98c1:3120::3, 2a06:98c1:3121::3, 188.114.96.3, ...
Connecting to dl.xanmod.org (dl.xanmod.org)|2a06:98c1:3120::3|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden
2024-05-08 20:56:17 ERROR 403: Forbidden.

any idea how to solve that

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

try a second time

install and have

Err:10 http://mirror.hetzner.com/debian/security bookworm-security/main amd64 Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 2a01:4ff:ff00::3:3 80]
Ign:10 http://mirror.hetzner.com/debian/security bookworm-security/main amd64 Packages
Err:10 http://mirror.hetzner.com/debian/security bookworm-security/main amd64 Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 2a01:4ff:ff00::3:3 80]
Reading package lists... Done
E: Failed to fetch http://mirror.hetzner.com/debian/security/dists/bookworm-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 2a01:4ff:ff00::3:3 80]
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

vinceducat commented May 8, 2024

@Ysurac the script kill the vm after a restart ... i have to reinstall ... :-(

the kernel on hetzner is Linux debian-2gb-nbg1-4 6.1.0-20-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.85-1 (2024-04-11) x86_64 and it try to install the snapshot with KERNEL="6.6" option ... is it ok ?

@Ysurac
Copy link
Owner

Ysurac commented May 9, 2024

It seems that xanmod have an issue. I will check...

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

@Ysurac dl.xanmod.org seems to be not accessible from hetzner but ok from my home ... :-(

@vinceducat
Copy link
Author

@Ysurac install of test version is ok now ..

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants