You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
More of a question than an issue: I'm using rusb for most USB access, and libusb1-sys to access the libusb asynchronous interface. Since rusb depends on libusb1-sys, I wonder if it might be better if rusb exposed the libusb1-sys that it uses, rather than requiring projects that use both to depend on both libraries separately?
In particular, I wonder if there's some risk of the two libraries using subtly different versions of libusb and causing errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it might make sense. Also I think about merging two repo libusb1-sys and rusb in one workspace.
If there are no objections, I plan to merge the repositories and re-export in the next minor release.
More of a question than an issue: I'm using rusb for most USB access, and libusb1-sys to access the libusb asynchronous interface. Since rusb depends on libusb1-sys, I wonder if it might be better if rusb exposed the libusb1-sys that it uses, rather than requiring projects that use both to depend on both libraries separately?
In particular, I wonder if there's some risk of the two libraries using subtly different versions of libusb and causing errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: