Add some possibility for custom tag ? #74
Comments
|
As I recall, Markup should already parse unknown custom tags in some default fashion, which is dictated by the spec. What is currently happening? |
|
Anton Bachin ***@***.***> writes:
As I recall, Markup should already parse unknown custom tags in some default fashion, which is dictated by the spec. What is currently happening?
Yes, this is what is happening, but I would like to change this for some
custom tag. The idea is that this tag are preprocessed and never sent to
a client. I just want to control the lexical convention of such tags to
accept ocaml code, but still nested tags. like in
```
<ml> let x = a && b
let _ = echo <p>coucou</p>
</ml>
```
This is almost working except for that '&' which are rejected.
Cheers,
Christophe
… —
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
--
Christophe Raffalli
tél: +689 87 23 11 48
web: http://raffalli.eu
Ce mail est signé avec pgp (Pièce jointe signature.asc, clef sur https://raffalli.eu/pgp)
This mail is signed with pgp (Attachment signature.asc, key on https://raffalli.eu/pgp)
|
|
Lexical conventions in HTML vary for the content of various tags like |
|
As I understand it, you want to have custom tags for which the lexical conventions for the content are similar to |
|
Anton Bachin ***@***.***> writes:
As I understand it, you want to have custom tags for which the lexical conventions for the content are similar to <script>, because in <script> & has no
special HTML meaning.
I need the same as script except I want nesting.
In fact I know how I could do it! Just need more information in the
report function, not just location, but:
- The lists of tag from where I am to the top
- Am I parsing the value of specific attribute (and I want its name)
- Am I parsing attributes in general, but not parsing an attribute value.
Example
<html><head></head><body><a href="...&..."></a></body></html>
Would report with the following list:
[InAttr "href"; InTag "a"; InTag "body"; InTag "html"]
With this, I could maybe ignore some errors ang get what I want.
It seems relatively easy ? But my break existing code if report
needs an extra argument ? Could have a ~report and ~report_detail
arguments ?
I might propose a PR ...
… —
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
--
Christophe Raffalli
tél: +689 87 23 11 48
web: http://raffalli.eu
Ce mail est signé avec pgp (Pièce jointe signature.asc, clef sur https://raffalli.eu/pgp)
This mail is signed with pgp (Attachment signature.asc, key on https://raffalli.eu/pgp)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I am doing an ocaml equivalent of php (but better) for simple_httpd, and currently I use two tags:
<script "type="ml">...</script>accept all ocaml lexical convention but does not allow for nesting html (I would prefer not to use string or ppx).<ml>...</ml>accept nesting but does not accept characters like '&'.Altough I could live with this it is not nice.
Do you see a way to make markup extensible with some custom tags ?
Here is an example of what I use:
Which I find nice except for the special characteres.
I would also like if my
<ml>tag could occur anywhere in the document.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: