Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any plans on running evals for codellama? #11

Open
ErikBjare opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Any plans on running evals for codellama? #11

ErikBjare opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ErikBjare
Copy link

I'm keeping https://github.com/ErikBjare/are-copilots-local-yet up-to-date, and would love to see some codellama numbers given it's now SOTA :)

@nicoladainese96
Copy link

I would be interested in this as well. I had some attempts on my own for the Python-7B and Instruct-7B models but if I use the same code of Llama-2 the performance is horrible (e.g., 3 and 8% respectively). As a comparison, with the same exact code, Llama-2-chat-7b gives me 11%.

@smart-lty
Copy link

I would be interested in this as well. I had some attempts on my own for the Python-7B and Instruct-7B models but if I use the same code of Llama-2 the performance is horrible (e.g., 3 and 8% respectively). As a comparison, with the same exact code, Llama-2-chat-7b gives me 11%.

I meet the same situation. Even if I try to use instructions in "core/prompts.py", the performance for codellama-7b is 22.8% for pass@1, still lower than the reported number in official document by a large margin. Have you fixed this problem?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants