There is a huge difference between the results in the summary and the combined_reference.

[kangxiongbin]

Hi,
I used metaquast to evaluate the assembly results. The reference contains 100 strains. I found that results in this folder combine_reference gave 76% of genome fractions, but the average of 100 strain genome fractions in the folder summary was 88%, and the median was 90%. Inaddition, summary folder gives higher indel and mismatch errors than combine_reference. I want to ask why this is?
Many thanks!