Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make project more inviting for developers #12

Open
abooij opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Make project more inviting for developers #12

abooij opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@abooij
Copy link
Owner

abooij commented Apr 13, 2016

What is needed to make this project more developer-friendly?

@abooij abooij added this to the v0.1.0.0 milestone Apr 13, 2016
@xavier83
Copy link

I have no experience in display servers but interested in contributing, what can i do to help?

@abooij
Copy link
Owner Author

abooij commented Jul 20, 2016

Basically all the things that I think need attention are recorded as issues.

If you want to avoid having to dive into wayland documentation for a few weeks before you can get started, then I think #1, #2 and #6 are the most important issues right now.

#1 is an issue that a number of Haskell projects are suffering from, and likely requires work on cabal. So what I'd really like at this stage is a decent workaround (some kind of Makefile? autotools? but how do these interact with cabal?).

I'm not sure how to do #2 yet and personally don't consider it top priority: "simply" having a drop-in replacement of the wayland library will attract more attention than some arcane new library in a language that only a fraction of programmers know how to use.

#6: this shouldn't be too difficult (although there is quite some work involved). It would be nice if our drop-in replacement of libwayland were able to match the speed of libwayland. I don't think anyone is really benchmarking libwayland at the moment, but when they do, we should not come out an order of magnitude slower. In essence the binary (de)serialization code is already there; it just needs converting to use a different library.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants