You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While @pombredanne and I were reviewing the VCIO UI, it became clear that some of the data displayed in the Fixed by packages tab of the Vulnerability details page -- and thus the data in the DB -- is incorrect. The example was a query for VCID-2nyb-8rwu-aaag. The last 2 entries in the resulting Fixed by packages tab are
It seems counterintuitive that both of these versions would have been fixed rather than just one of them, and indeed an examination of the NVD Change History section for the CVE (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36518#VulnChangeHistorySection) reflects that the vulnerability was fixed in 2.13.2.1 but not in 2.13.2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It still may be useful to consider converting CPE values to PURLs. Needs some analysis to specify how that can be done in a consistent manner acceptable to the community.
While @pombredanne and I were reviewing the VCIO UI, it became clear that some of the data displayed in the
Fixed by packages
tab of theVulnerability details
page -- and thus the data in the DB -- is incorrect. The example was a query forVCID-2nyb-8rwu-aaag
. The last 2 entries in the resultingFixed by packages
tab areIt seems counterintuitive that both of these versions would have been fixed rather than just one of them, and indeed an examination of the NVD Change History section for the CVE (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36518#VulnChangeHistorySection) reflects that the vulnerability was fixed in 2.13.2.1 but not in 2.13.2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: