Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request/suggestion: Utilize fuse and rclone for windows ondemand sync and/or encryption #1261

Closed
Rihcus opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Feature Request Feature Request | Enhancement Request Rejected Request Rejected

Comments

@Rihcus
Copy link

Rihcus commented Feb 8, 2021

Regarding encryption and onedrive on demand rclone can do both via a fuse mount. Currently I have have rclone cach drive mounted via fuse which acts similarley to windows on demand sync. In rclone config:

Onedrive remote --> rclone cach --> fuse mount to local folder

For encrytption:
Onedrive remote --> encrypted drive --> rclone cach --> fuse mount local folder.

The pros to this aproach:
-- streams and caches files very quickly
-- upload cach can be stored in event of network outage (upload will happen upon reconnection)
-- fuse mounts to file system seamlessly

The negatives to this aproach:
-- Doesn't support onedrive revision control (if you save a file the old file is moved to onedrive trash and new file saved)
-- File corruption/damge can occur should fuse fail (happens if improper mount or force reboot, mostly can be recoverd from trash but if using encryption this can be a severe problem).

source:
https://rclone.org/cache/

@Rihcus Rihcus changed the title Utilize fuse and rclone for windows ondemand sync and/or encryption Feature request/suggestion: Utilize fuse and rclone for windows ondemand sync and/or encryption Feb 8, 2021
@abraunegg
Copy link
Owner

@Rihcus
Please see:

Encryption: #1023
On-Demand: #757

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 8, 2021
@abraunegg abraunegg added Feature Request Feature Request | Enhancement Request Rejected Request Rejected labels Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Feature Request Feature Request | Enhancement Request Rejected Request Rejected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants