We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I noticed these comments look out of place:
validate-pyproject/src/validate_pyproject/formats.py
Lines 169 to 170 in c150b15
They were probably meant to apply to the self.downloaded property.
self.downloaded
Consider this instead:
diff --git a/setuptools/config/_validate_pyproject/formats.py b/setuptools/config/_validate_pyproject/formats.py index aacf4092b..a76a1d147 100644 --- a/setuptools/config/_validate_pyproject/formats.py +++ b/setuptools/config/_validate_pyproject/formats.py @@ -162,12 +162,15 @@ class _TroveClassifier: """ downloaded: typing.Union[None, "Literal[False]", typing.Set[str]] + """ + None => not cached yet + False => unavailable + set => cached values + """ def __init__(self) -> None: self.downloaded = None self._skip_download = False - # None => not cached yet - # False => cache not available self.__name__ = "trove_classifier" # Emulate a public function def _disable_download(self) -> None:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I noticed these comments look out of place:
validate-pyproject/src/validate_pyproject/formats.py
Lines 169 to 170 in c150b15
They were probably meant to apply to the
self.downloaded
property.Consider this instead:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: