Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explosives from the RHS mod not compatible with ACE mod. #7714

Closed
GalNa opened this issue May 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Explosives from the RHS mod not compatible with ACE mod. #7714

GalNa opened this issue May 17, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@GalNa
Copy link

GalNa commented May 17, 2020

Mods (complete and add to the following information): @RHSSAF,@RHSAFRF

  • Arma 3: 1.96 stable
  • CBA: 3.15 stable
  • ACE3: 3.13 stable

Description:
TM-100/200/500 and in general all explosives from the RHSSAF/RHSAFRF mod do not have a matching explosives interface.

Steps to reproduce:

  • Take in VRAsenal TM-500, TNT or other any mine from RHS mod
  • Place it like a C4 charge
  • See what is no any interactions
@GalNa GalNa added the kind/bug label May 17, 2020
@GalNa GalNa changed the title TM-100/200/500 charge not not compatible with ACE mod. TM-100/200/500 charge not compatible with ACE mod. May 17, 2020
@GalNa GalNa changed the title TM-100/200/500 charge not compatible with ACE mod. Explosives from the RHS mod not compatible with ACE mod. May 17, 2020
@Whigital
Copy link
Contributor

Whigital commented May 25, 2020

RHS:AFRF explosives should be fully implemented with #7734, however, there currently isn't a compat for RHS:SAF.

@Whigital
Copy link
Contributor

Added compatibility for RHS:GREF too ....

@Whigital
Copy link
Contributor

Remaining incompatible explosives from RHS:USAF also added ....

@mharis001 mharis001 added this to the 3.13.3 milestone Jun 13, 2020
@mharis001
Copy link
Member

Closing as fixed by #7734 , #7735 , and #7736 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants