Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scope/patterns for different braces in SQF highlighting #32

Open
dslyecxi opened this issue Sep 12, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Add scope/patterns for different braces in SQF highlighting #32

dslyecxi opened this issue Sep 12, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@dslyecxi
Copy link

Presumably something that would be done in:
https://github.com/acemod/language-arma-atom/blob/master/grammars/sqf.json

The {}, (), [] braces should be defined such that a user can style them independent of normal text (which they seemingly currently are).

@kymckay kymckay added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Sep 12, 2015
@kymckay kymckay self-assigned this Sep 12, 2015
@kymckay
Copy link
Member

kymckay commented Sep 13, 2015

Not sure how best to do this, other atom packages don't seem to have patterns defined for such things (from what I can see) and there are no standard groups that seem relevant: https://manual.macromates.com/en/language_grammars

@Glowbal @jonpas thoughts?

@jonpas
Copy link
Member

jonpas commented Sep 20, 2015

It would be nice if it's possible.

@jonpas
Copy link
Member

jonpas commented Oct 3, 2015

@SilentSpike what's the status on researching this?

@kymckay
Copy link
Member

kymckay commented Oct 4, 2015

As above, doesn't seem to be any more to it so I'm not sure if we should or if it should be handled by some other component of atom.

@jonpas jonpas modified the milestones: Backlog, 2.0.0 Oct 4, 2015
@jonpas
Copy link
Member

jonpas commented Oct 4, 2015

Moving to backlog then.

@jonpas jonpas removed this from the Backlog milestone Jan 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants