We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Basically this module should never be configured to Active:No -- but it should still fail a bit more elegantly here on the off chance it is.
currently it loads with a blank page saying "this module could not be found" if it's set to Active:no (in the modules table i think)
modules
found during C-BIg testing may 9. filed a bug after discussion with @ridz1208 and Dave.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The problem isn't that it fails when Active='N', the problem is that it fails when it's not on the file system (even if it's inactive)
Sorry, something went wrong.
@driusan maybe it can be a try catch to get the module info and if it fails it can just replace with NA or some other message
still seems like an important bug (did not test)
@driusan @christinerogers I agree that this module shouldn't be set No; But I am getting the below attached attached message when set to 'No'..
What is the fix we need to implement here. I am little confused.
sruthymathew123
No branches or pull requests
Basically this module should never be configured to Active:No -- but it should still fail a bit more elegantly here on the off chance it is.
currently it loads with a blank page saying "this module could not be found" if it's set to Active:no (in the
modules
table i think)found during C-BIg testing may 9. filed a bug after discussion with @ridz1208 and Dave.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: