Code Review Improvements: PgBouncer Detection, Documentation & Test Clarity #640
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Implements code review improvements from the code-reviewer agent's feedback on the AdCP v2.2.0 budget migration and PgBouncer support PRs.
Changes
1. PgBouncer Detection Enhancement (Warning #2)
Problem: String matching for
:6543could cause false positives (e.g., passwords containing:6543)Solution:
_is_pgbouncer_connection()functionurllib.parse.urlparse()for robust port detectionImpact: Eliminates false positives from passwords or other text containing
:65432. Test Naming & Documentation (Warning #3)
Problem: Test named
test_negative_budget_returns_validation_errorbut actually raises exceptionSolution:
test_negative_budget_raises_tool_errorImpact: Test name now accurately reflects behavior
3. Budget Format Migration Comments (Suggestion #1)
Problem: Budget format changed from Budget objects to floats, but no context in test files
Solution:
Impact: Future developers understand the budget format change
4. Performance Metrics Documentation (Suggestion #2)
Problem: PgBouncer documentation lacks performance characteristics
Solution:
Impact: Operators can tune settings based on workload
5. Code Documentation Enhancement (Suggestion #3)
Problem: Overflow normalization comment lacks detail about negative values
Solution:
Impact: Prevents confusion during testing and debugging
Test Coverage
_is_pgbouncer_connection()Documentation
Review Checklist
Related PRs