Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support Data Quality #203

Open
4 tasks
jlblcc opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Open
4 tasks

Support Data Quality #203

jlblcc opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement Improve or modify an existing feature mdEditor mdEditor update needed
Milestone
2.7.0

Comments

@jlblcc
Copy link
Member

jlblcc commented Jul 30, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Implement support for ISO 19157 quantitative data quality elements, map to FGDC CSDGM.

http://standards.iso.org/iso/19157/-2/mdq/1.0/index.html
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/DQ_DataQuality

From FGDC CSDGM:

https://www.fgdc.gov/csdgmgraphical/dataq.htm

  • attribute accuracy
  • positional accuracy
  • completeness
  • logical consistency
@jlblcc jlblcc added enhancement Improve or modify an existing feature mdEditor mdEditor update needed labels Jul 30, 2018
@jlblcc
Copy link
Member Author

jlblcc commented Jul 30, 2018

FYI @pshealy

@jlblcc jlblcc mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2018
Open
3 tasks
@jlblcc jlblcc added this to the Future milestone Oct 14, 2018
@jlblcc jlblcc modified the milestones: Future, 2.7.0 Jun 12, 2019
@hmaier-fws hmaier-fws mentioned this issue Aug 1, 2023
Open
@jwaspin
Copy link
Contributor

jwaspin commented Mar 13, 2024

@hmaier-fws @dwalt Can/should this one be closed?

@dwalt
Copy link
Collaborator

dwalt commented Mar 14, 2024

@jwaspin @hmaier-fws Yes, this can be closed. A major milestone!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Improve or modify an existing feature mdEditor mdEditor update needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.7.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jlblcc @dwalt @jwaspin