Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DCAT-US writer: support dataQuality field #278

Open
Tracked by #269
jwaspin opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #269

DCAT-US writer: support dataQuality field #278

jwaspin opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
discussion Issue for discussion by stakeholder group new feature Add new functionality not currently available writer:dcat-us Data.gov DCAT-US Schema

Comments

@jwaspin
Copy link
Contributor

jwaspin commented Sep 7, 2023 •
edited by hmaier-fws
Loading

Support DCAT-US dataQuality field.

Conditionality: optional
Namespace: pod: "https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema#"

DCAT-US schema mapping dataQuality: "pod:dataQuality"

Description

U.S. Government specific. Whether the dataset meets the agency’s Information Quality Guidelines (true/false)

mdJSON mapping

This is a boolean to indicate whether data "conforms" to agency standards, value seems negligble
This was referenced Sep 7, 2023
Open
Closed
@hmaier-fws hmaier-fws added writer:dcat-us Data.gov DCAT-US Schema new feature Add new functionality not currently available labels Sep 11, 2023
@hmaier-fws hmaier-fws changed the title DCAT-US writer: Data Quality DCAT-US writer: support dataQuality field Sep 12, 2023
@hmaier-fws hmaier-fws added the discussion Issue for discussion by stakeholder group label Sep 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion Issue for discussion by stakeholder group new feature Add new functionality not currently available writer:dcat-us Data.gov DCAT-US Schema
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hmaier-fws @jwaspin