Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement missing ufunc.outer functions for binary ops #612

Open
Tracked by #1424
ricardoV94 opened this issue Oct 12, 2021 · 4 comments
Open
Tracked by #1424

Implement missing ufunc.outer functions for binary ops #612

ricardoV94 opened this issue Oct 12, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request NumPy compatibility

Comments

@ricardoV94
Copy link
Contributor

https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.ufunc.outer.html
@brandonwillard
Copy link
Member

Are you considering adding a .outer method interface to Elemwise, or something similar?

@ricardoV94
Copy link
Contributor Author

ricardoV94 commented Oct 13, 2021 •
edited
Loading

I didn't plan anything in particular. But yes, if that is possible it would provide the same API as in NumPy. Do you see any problems with such approach?

@brandonwillard
Copy link
Member

Doesn't seem like a problem to do that. Elemwise is basically a ufunc-like Op wrapper anyway.

@brandonwillard brandonwillard added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 4, 2022
@brandonwillard
Copy link
Member

This needs to be implemented on top of #695.

@brandonwillard brandonwillard mentioned this issue Aug 4, 2022
Open
@rlouf rlouf mentioned this issue Feb 13, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request NumPy compatibility
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@brandonwillard @ricardoV94