Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Docs should mention that mst-persist is compatible with redux-persist's Storage Engines #13

Closed
agilgur5 opened this issue Jul 17, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #15
Closed

Docs should mention that mst-persist is compatible with redux-persist's Storage Engines #13

agilgur5 opened this issue Jul 17, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #15
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers scope: docs Documentation could be improved

Comments

@agilgur5
Copy link
Owner

redux-persist's Storage Engines all follow the same localForage-style async promise API, so they should all be compatible with mst-persist as well.
The docs should mention this interoperability as it adds a lot more options for developers.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers scope: docs Documentation could be improved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix Support for Node and Add Docs for Node and SSR agilgur5/mst-persist
1 participant
@agilgur5