We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sur la propriété suivante: https://stageportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/AGROVOC?p=properties&propertyid=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fdc%2Fterms%2FaccrualMethod dans raw data qu'on duplique le rdfs:comment dans skos:definiton... ?? en tout cas quand on regarde l'export TTL (ou autre) on ne voit pas de propriété skos:definition. Ce problème est présent sur tout AGROVOC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Sur la propriété suivante: https://stageportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/AGROVOC?p=properties&propertyid=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fdc%2Fterms%2FaccrualMethod dans raw data qu'on duplique le rdfs:comment dans skos:definiton... ?? en tout cas quand on regarde l'export TTL (ou autre) on ne voit pas de propriété skos:definition. Ce problème est présent sur tout AGROVOC
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/29259906/396813625-2c79fd8e-8ff0-4435-b1e5-9239344d61bc.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.jfqR3w73RiOdrrr-RTI3w7PPlxT0zWm8yjpw6zUv69Y)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: