Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Allow Users to Edit HTTP Request Content #15

Open
Gitbreast opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Request: Allow Users to Edit HTTP Request Content #15

Gitbreast opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Gitbreast
Copy link

Gitbreast commented Aug 28, 2024

Description

I am currently using this only plugin from several LLM plugins, due to its excellent compatibility and ease of use. Thank you.

Is it ok to open up the ability for users to edit the content of HTTP requests? This would allow for better compatibility. My current LLM platform can enable additional features like web search by including extra API parameters (the tools list). Of course, including top_p and temperature and so on.

Request

  1. Please consider allowing users to modify the HTTP request content. This would greatly enhance compatibility with various LLM platforms that rely on additional API parameters for extended functionalities. Higher compatibility also helps to reduce subsequent maintenance.
  2. Consider adding a way to reference the page title in the custom prompt, like {{title}}.
image
@ahonn
Copy link
Owner

ahonn commented Aug 28, 2024

Sounds good! I will consider adding this feature.

@jjohare
Copy link

jjohare commented Sep 9, 2024

I'm trying to hook into perplexity and have the same problem. I have done local changes to the code to add in the keys and skip around langchain's openai dependency but I can't get the plugin to install. Watching here for updates to the API flexibility. Thanks, this is the sleekest of the option I have found too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants