Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reviewer 3,Q5: Clarification regarding using general for defect prediction vs all other tasks #38

Open
Suvodeep90 opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Reviewer 3,Q5: Clarification regarding using general for defect prediction vs all other tasks #38

Suvodeep90 opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
Clarification writing writing task for review

Comments

@Suvodeep90
Copy link
Contributor

Up to page 5 (Sections 1-2), the paper broadly discusses the importance of learning models from hundreds of projects to have more generic and more reliable software analytics in a broader sense. However, from Section 3 to Section 6, the manuscript focuses on defect prediction ONLY.
@Suvodeep90 Suvodeep90 added writing writing task for review Clarification labels Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Clarification writing writing task for review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Suvodeep90