Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reviewer 3,Q9: Dataset quality #43

Open
Suvodeep90 opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Reviewer 3,Q9: Dataset quality #43

Suvodeep90 opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Suvodeep90
Copy link
Contributor

Furthermore, the dataset looks quite strange to me. Looking at the defect distributions (left-most boxplot in Figure 4), I do see that 75% of the projects (the last quartile) have more than 60% of defective modules (classes/methods?). Some have a defective percentage above 80%. Do we need machine learning to predict defects in projects where almost all modules are defectives? In these projects, a simple, constant classifier would work the best. The results also show this for ZeroR in Section 5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant