Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reviewer 3,Q12: Question regarding ZeroR learner #46

Open
Suvodeep90 opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Reviewer 3,Q12: Question regarding ZeroR learner #46

Suvodeep90 opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
Clarification writing writing task for review

Comments

@Suvodeep90
Copy link
Contributor

Section 5 contains the following recommendation “As to ZeroR, we cannot recommend that approach. While ZeroR makes few mistakes (low ifas and low pfs), it scores badly on other measures (very low recalls and popt(20).” This argument does not convince me as ZeroR gets the best results for two metrics (as far as I understand). Please elaborate more on why we cannot use ZeroR. Besides, ZeroR may work relatively well because of projects with a very large number of defects. Perhaps, some in-depth analysis of the correlation between defect distributions and performances of the models would be very useful.

@Suvodeep90 Suvodeep90 added writing writing task for review Clarification labels Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Clarification writing writing task for review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant