Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review: TZIP "Off-Chain Message Signing" #739

Open
jdsika opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Review: TZIP "Off-Chain Message Signing" #739

jdsika opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jdsika
Copy link

jdsika commented Mar 20, 2024

Hello team,

in our efforts to introduce a CAIPs standard compliant Sign-in With Tezos message format and signing process we have created TZIP-31/32 to introduce a standardized way of signing messages which are not meant to be used as on-chain transactions. A merge request for TZIP-33 for SIWT is here.

We have created the library "Sign In With Tezos (SIWT)" alongside the specification above as a reference implementation. This library uses beacon and taquito and should provide maximum convenience for developers to:

* proving the users ownership of the private key to the address the user signs in with,
* adding permissions to use your API or backend using on chain data.

We would like to get your input on the current TZIP-31/32 proposal and encourage an implementation into your product to make this a real standard. The overall proposal was created in a close cooperation with the Kukai team. It would provide a standardized way of creating a signing message (and more applications) which are currently documented as followed:
https://tezostaquito.io/docs/signing/#generating-a-signature-with-beacon-sdk

Please feel free to contact me on Slack as well if you would like to get in conversation!

Thank you very much!

Best regards
Carlo (jdsika)

@jdsika jdsika added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 20, 2024
@jdsika
Copy link
Author

jdsika commented Jul 11, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant