-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create release 0.5.0 #90
Comments
I think that the cmake stuff has had enough bake time now and it might be wise to get that release out the door before we start doctoring with the runtime detection. |
I just checked off the last two remaining issues from the list. As far as I'm concerned, it's time for a release. With my unfamiliarity with CMake, I'm unsure of exactly how solid the CMake stuff is now. We recently had some pull requests to push some minor issues that were found in production. Should we wait a week or two to see if something else shakes out? I guess we could just release |
I think that the major things have been ironed out since we have been able to integrate it with three package managers and htot even cross compiled with the build system.
Sounds reasonable |
Hi, I tried the CMakeLists.txt cross compiling for a i.MX6ULL which is a Armv7-A processor. According to this document, "Armv7-A and AArch32 have the same general purpose Arm registers – 16 x 32-bit general purpose Arm registers (R0-R15)." As you can see from the output below, somehow the CMakeLists.txt does not detect that I am cross compiling for ARM:
If I read the documentation correctly, my target ARCH should be ARM32 but with NEON enabled, right? |
ah I think this line is the problem:
should probably be:
|
IIRC we decided to disable NEON32 support by default even if the compiler supports it, because it cannot be detected at runtime whether or not the CPU supports the NEON extensions. Therefore you need to explicitly enable NEON32 support via the GUI or with the CLI like so:
HTH (and please open a new issue or discussion next time) |
@aklomp I think we can conclude the stabilization phase now as there haven't been any new issues for a month now. So I don't think there is any point in delaying the release any further. |
I agree, let's get it done. It's on my to-do list for tomorrow. |
This is a meta-issue to track the work needed before releasing v0.5.0. Closing this issue will trigger the release of
v0.5.0
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: