Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature]: datagram support (RFC9221) #146

Closed
1 task done
ruiqizhou opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #307
Closed
1 task done

[Feature]: datagram support (RFC9221) #146

ruiqizhou opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #307
Labels
💡 enhancement New feature or request help wanted The suggestion or request has been accepted, we need you to help us by sending a pull request.
Milestone
Future

Comments

@ruiqizhou
Copy link
Collaborator

ruiqizhou commented Apr 14, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Before request a new feature

  • I have searched the issues of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.

Describe the feature you'd like supported

RFC9221: An Unreliable Datagram Extension to QUIC

中文译稿：RFC9221-datagram-zh

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response
@ruiqizhou ruiqizhou added 💡 enhancement New feature or request help wanted The suggestion or request has been accepted, we need you to help us by sending a pull request. labels Apr 14, 2022
@ruiqizhou ruiqizhou added this to the Future milestone Apr 14, 2022
@Kulsk Kulsk linked a pull request May 24, 2023 that will close this issue
[+] QUIC datagram (RFC9221), sending datagrams and bytestreams on http3 connections (non-standard extensions), and bugfix #307
Merged
@Kulsk Kulsk closed this as completed May 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
💡 enhancement New feature or request help wanted The suggestion or request has been accepted, we need you to help us by sending a pull request.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Future
2 participants
@Kulsk @ruiqizhou