You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a container entry is selected, it is not possible to deselect it. Clicking it is only toggling between open and closed.
A third state should be added to deselect the selected container entry. When it's not selected, the parent (or root level) should be selected again.
The implementation of deselecting an entry would be very useful to add multiple entries to a root. For now, when you want to add an entry while a container entry is selected, a new entry is always added to the selected container entry (the parent is selected by default within the modal). But this is very frustrating when you want to add multiple entries to the root.
A solution could be to add 3 states:
selected, but closed: you can not see the underlaying children
selected, but open: you can see the underlaying children
not selected: you're add the parent level again (which can be the root)
For now, clicking a container is only toggling between open and closed, but a third 'not selected' option would be a solution for this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a container entry is selected, it is not possible to deselect it. Clicking it is only toggling between open and closed.
A third state should be added to deselect the selected container entry. When it's not selected, the parent (or root level) should be selected again.
The implementation of deselecting an entry would be very useful to add multiple entries to a root. For now, when you want to add an entry while a container entry is selected, a new entry is always added to the selected container entry (the parent is selected by default within the modal). But this is very frustrating when you want to add multiple entries to the root.
A solution could be to add 3 states:
For now, clicking a container is only toggling between open and closed, but a third 'not selected' option would be a solution for this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: