[Refactor] Nit: align naming of tx_hash / transaction_hash, tx_type / transaction_type

[zerosnacks]

Component

consensus, eips, genesis, network, json-rpc, rpc

Describe the feature you would like

A nit, but I noticed an inconsistency when switching between a pending transaction (.tx_hash()) and receipt (.transaction_hash):

For Log and Receipt: transaction_hash is used.
For TxEnvelope, Heartbeat, TraceResult: tx_hash is used.

Another case is tx_type and transaction_type:

For Transaction, TransactionReceipt, TransactionRequest: transaction_type is used.
For ReceiptEnvelope and : tx_type is used.

I propose we align the naming. My preference is transaction_hash and transaction_type, this is in line with signature_hash.

Additional context

No response

[gakonst]

It seems like the main motivator here is intellisense so if we do something we could use doc(alias) for things that make sense for autocomplete, and keep the other type names the same.