Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it easier to use the Design System to create non GOV.UK services #777

Open
2 tasks
timpaul opened this issue Jan 29, 2019 · 4 comments
Open
2 tasks
Labels
epic Epics are used in planning project boards to group related stories

Comments

@timpaul
Copy link
Contributor

timpaul commented Jan 29, 2019

What

Make it easier to adapt the GOV.UK Design System and GOV.UK Frontend for use by services that aren't on GOV.UK.

Why

We know that there are many teams in government who are building services that could use our work but that don't look like GOV.UK, including:

  • admin and case working systems
  • intranets
  • local authority websites

All new public services must comply with WCAG 2.1 by September 2019, including those that aren't on GOV.UK. The Design System will be WCAG 2.1 compliant, so by making it easier for these teams to adopt we're helping them comply with the law.

Stories

@rinto-cyriac
Copy link

This is an interesting topic to us as we are in the process of adopting gds design system to make our services work better.

@hannalaakso
Copy link
Member

@hannalaakso
Copy link
Member

Also as raised by @RosieClayton, we should look at linking to https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/design/making-your-service-look-like-govuk#if-your-service-isnt-on-govuk more prominently (currently only linked to from Fonts)

@stevenjmesser
Copy link
Contributor

Would want to get @36degrees's opinion on the effort involved with maintaining an unstyled version of the design system.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
epic Epics are used in planning project boards to group related stories
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants