Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(eslint-plugin-prettier): peer version #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2022

Conversation

JAdshead
Copy link
Contributor

@JAdshead JAdshead commented Jan 14, 2022

Allow eslint-config-amex to work with eslint-plugin-prettier@4

Description

Please make sure that the PR fulfills these requirements

  • I checked that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation and I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • Rule changes includes a comment to describe the reasoning behind the change.
  • PR contains a single rule change.

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation (adding or updating documentation)
  • Dependency update

@JAdshead JAdshead requested a review from a team as a code owner January 14, 2022 19:06
@bishnubista bishnubista merged commit ef06bd0 into main Jan 14, 2022
@bishnubista bishnubista deleted the fix/eslint-plugin-prettier branch January 14, 2022 20:08
oneamexbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2022
## [15.0.2](v15.0.1...v15.0.2) (2022-01-14)

### Bug Fixes

* **eslint-plugin-prettier:** peer version ([#92](#92)) ([ef06bd0](ef06bd0))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants