Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

conda-forge CI failing on Linux May 2023 #674

Closed
traversaro opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

conda-forge CI failing on Linux May 2023 #674

traversaro opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator

See https://github.com/ami-iit/bipedal-locomotion-framework/actions/workflows/conda-forge-ci.yml?query=event%3Aschedule , it has been falling for ~3 weeks as of the day I open the issue (I have to figure out how to get notifications for CI failing in blf).

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

(I have to figure out how to get notifications for CI failing in blf)

From https://docs.github.com/en/actions/monitoring-and-troubleshooting-workflows/notifications-for-workflow-runs :

Notifications for scheduled workflows are sent to the user who initially created the workflow. If a different user updates the cron syntax in the workflow file, subsequent notifications will be sent to that user instead. If a scheduled workflow is disabled and then re-enabled, notifications will be sent to the user who re-enabled the workflow rather than the user who last modified the cron syntax.

That is strange, can't we have two users getting the notification?

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Indeed, the CI failed when manifpy was updated from _13 to _14 .

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ahh, now I remember, it was supposed to be fixed by conda-forge/compilers-feedstock#57, but that PR got stuck.

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For reference the pybind11 problem is conda-forge/pybind11-feedstock#77 .

@GiulioRomualdi
Copy link
Member

Since #675 fixed the issue, I think we can close it right?

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes!

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ahh, now I remember, it was supposed to be fixed by conda-forge/compilers-feedstock#57, but that PR got stuck.

The PR was finally merged, so probably we can remove the workaround added in #675 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants