Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

grype feature parity with osv.dev #794

Open
1 of 4 tasks
cpendery opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

grype feature parity with osv.dev #794

cpendery opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cpendery
Copy link
Contributor

cpendery commented Jun 17, 2022

What would you like to be added:
I'd like the data sources of grype to be at least inclusive of the ecosystems in osv.dev. I'm happy to contribute support for these, but I don't believe the code is currently open sourced for producing the databases

Why is this needed:
We could use a wider range of vulnerabilities included to scan against. It makes the product more complete and powerful

Additional context:
Ecosystems to add:

  • Android
  • Rust (crates.io)
  • OSS-Fuzz (mainly C/C++)
  • Erlang (hex)
@tgerla
Copy link
Contributor

tgerla commented Sep 16, 2022

Hey @cpendery, sorry for the delay responding to this ticket. We finally had a chance to discuss this as a team, and it is definitely a feature that we want to add at some point. You are correct that we have not yet open sourced the database tooling. We are going to need some additional internal conversations around that. In the meantime, we will leave this ticket open since it is something we want to get to as soon as we are able. Thanks for your patience!

Tim

@spiffcs spiffcs moved this to Parking Lot (Comments or Progress) in OSS Oct 13, 2022
@kzantow
Copy link
Contributor

kzantow commented Dec 22, 2022

We are actively working to open-source the database builder, and as a follow-on investigate integrating osv.dev.

@kzantow kzantow assigned kzantow and unassigned tgerla Dec 22, 2022
@kzantow kzantow moved this from Parking Lot (Comments or Progress) to In Progress (Actively Resolving) in OSS Dec 22, 2022
@kzantow kzantow removed their assignment Jan 13, 2023
@kzantow kzantow moved this from In Progress to Backlog in OSS Jan 13, 2023
@jaskaransinghdr6j
Copy link

Is there any progress on slotting osv.dev integration? I find many Golang false negatives that could have been caught by an osv data feed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants