add flex-wrap attribute for easy access to flex-wrap

[EnoF]

I wasn't sure where to add documentation for this. When necessary I can add and amend the commit :)

[Frank3K]

I would use this: currently I have made a class for this property in my app's CSS.

I think the change of a pull would be higher if the .gitignore was left out of the commit.

[kpgarrod]

I would also use this.
On 13 Nov 2014 18:55, "Frank3K" notifications@github.com wrote:

I would use this: currently I have made a class for this property in my
app's CSS.

I think the change of a pull would be higher if the .gitignore was left
out of the commit.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#634 (comment).

[ajoslin]

I like this change.

Remember, though, you don't need to add the prefixed flex-wrap rules: we add those with autoprefixr in our build.

@EnoF have you signed the google CLA? https://cla.developers.google.com/about/google-individual?csw=1

If you can remove the prefixed rules and verify you've signed the CLA, I'll merge.

[EnoF]

@ajoslin I amended the commit to remove the prefixes. I also signed the CLA. However the build is now failing due to:

Error: Cannot find module 'gulp-ng-annotate'

I've debugged a little and the two commits that went wrong are: 12b8cbc and e59a36f. I suspect the merge conflict in this got resolved incorrectly. Missing gulp-ng-annotate dependency in the package.json.

[plato-cambrian]

I'm gonna get confused about which prefix to use if we have flex, flex-wrap, layout, layout-align, layout-fill, layout-padding

I would unify the names as much as possibly by calling this new rule layout-wrap.
it goes on the container element after all

[ajoslin]

@plato-cambrian good point.

Merged with layout-wrap name instead.