Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

project dead? #44

Open
3 tasks done
MrRawes opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks done

project dead? #44

MrRawes opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@MrRawes
Copy link

MrRawes commented Mar 16, 2022

Checklist

  • I'm asking a question
  • I've looked through the README and FAQ for similar questions
  • I've searched the bugtracker for similar questions including closed ones

Question

i am asking is this project dead? i am pretty sure it is and if it is you should probably archive this repo
also the license seems to not allow simply using this fork

@MrRawes MrRawes added the question Further information is requested label Mar 16, 2022
@horahoradev
Copy link

😨
will archive eventually, yt-dlp is the successor

@jxu
Copy link

jxu commented Apr 9, 2022

I wouldn't worry about the crayon license (one collaborator admits how ridiculous it is #18 (comment)). It itself is contradictory, excluding the project from using its own code):

It is also not permitted to be used in any project that contains contributions from either remitamine or dstftw.

while of course those users already have 1642 and 6250 commits in the fork already https://github.com/animelover1984/youtube-dl/graphs/contributors

@pukkandan
Copy link

It itself is contradictory, excluding the project from using its own code

Technically, no. licenses don't apply to the owner of the code. But (if the license were enforced), it does prevent any other fork from using this code

But, despite the licence notice in the repo, the maintainers have actually given out all current code under Unlicense yt-dlp/yt-dlp#31 (comment)

Not sure how this is relevant to this post though 🤷

@jxu
Copy link

jxu commented Apr 11, 2022

I thought that was if the license said it applied to end users, which this license doesn't.

It's relevant because it is mentioned in the original post.

@MrRawes
Copy link
Author

MrRawes commented Apr 12, 2022

@animelover1984 @horahoradev @bbepis IMO the LICENSE file should have Unlicense appended for the sake of clarity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants