Hello there!👋 Welcome to the project!💖

Thank you and congrats 🎉 for opening your very first issue in this project.
AnitaB.org Open Source is an inclusive community, committed to creating a safe and positive environment 🌸 Please follow our Code Of Conduct 🙌
You can learn more about the community on our website and documentation repository.

You may submit a PR on the same if you like!
Please follow our Commit Message Style Guide and Coding Standards while sending PRs.
If you want to report a bug 🐞, please follow our bug_report.md template. Please make sure you include steps to reproduce it and be patient we will get back to you as soon as we can 👀

Also, feel free to join us on AnitaB.org Open Source Zulip Community 🤝 We have different streams for each active repository for discussions.👩🏻‍💻🧑🏻‍💻
For mentorship-backend, join #mentorship-system stream! Hope you have a great time here :)

@justdvnsh do you want to work on this?

@epicadk I don't think I'd be able to work on this. Would not be able to give in the time for this issue.

@epicadk can I try working on this?

@justdvnsh can you tell me the exact endpoint you want changed?

@justdvnsh @epicadk
About the structure of the response :

• So do I include both the users in the task - the mentor and the mentee details in the response JSON?

• Right now it's a list of comment objects being returned. I'm thinking of having a list with 2 key value pairs :-

      - comments :- value will contain a list of comment objects
  
      - users :-  value will contain a list with 2 key-value pairs -  user_id being the key and value being the details of the user
  

Sure that works or you could change the comment response to include the corresponding user within the comment. I think this way makes more sense.

@epicadk but wouldn't that be sending a lot of redundant information? Since there are only 2 users involved, I'd be sending the same info over and over again. Response might become unnecessarily big.

Duplicate issue #685