How to add things to the agenda

[felixfontein]

Open questions:

1. Does every agenda entry need an issue here?
2. a) Should the issue be mentioned in Community Working Group Meeting Agenda ansible/community#539?
   b) Or should that issue be locked and only used for announcements / meeting minutes?
   * In that case, a list of potential topics should be posted before the meeting in the agenda?
   * Or should the meeting work with the open issues here (we can use labels to organize them better for that)?

[felixfontein]

Details of today's discussions can be found in the log (see link in https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/ansible-community/2021-03-31/ansible_community_meeting.2021-03-31-18.00.html). We did not come to a final conclusion today, but several people favoured 2b).

[felixfontein]

A more concrete proposal for 2b):

Proposal

1. Every agenda item is created as an issue in this repository.
2. The agenda (Community Working Group Meeting Agenda ansible/community#539) is locked, and only meeting summaries/minutes are posted.
3. All steering committee members can add/remove labels, and we use labels to denote priorities, area of topic, and add next_meeting if we think this should be discussed in the next meeting.
4. At the meeting, we look at the list of open issues, and issues with next_meeting get first priority.
   • Currently we assume that the list of open issues won't be too long, and that not too many will have a next_meeting label, so we don't need a fully defined process on how to select topics for the meeting.
   • If we find out that this assumption isn't good, we can re-evaluate/discuss in a couple of meetings.

[felixfontein]

The community meeting agreed to accept this proposal.

[felixfontein]

ansible/community#539 is locked and the rules posted there, and the next_meeting label already exists, so closing.

[Andersson007]

@felixfontein i think we should create a pinned issue with a summary

[felixfontein]

@Andersson007 I think it's better to add it to the README instead.

[Andersson007]

@Andersson007 I think it's better to add it to the README instead.

Ah, forgot about README:) it's also OK