This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 10, 2021. It is now read-only.
feat: allow developer to get supersetclient instance #552
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🏆 Enhancements
In the existing implementation,
SupersetClient.getInstance()
will always throw error unless you also pass aSupersetClient
instance as an argument. Then it will just return what you pass in as an argument back.I believe the original intention was to force developer to call
SupersetClient.configure()
before calling.getInstance()
but even after calling.configure()
. The.getInstance()
itself is still not useful by itself. Calling it without argument, hoping to obtained the configuredSupersetClient
results in anError
. (I want to get the host name from the already configured singleton) and if I already have theSupersetClient
instance, I would not bother calling this function.This PR modifies the code to preserve the original intention, but allow
.getInstance()
to return the configuredSupersetClient
if it already exists. (The only way for it to exist is somebody must have called.configure()
before that.)Technically this is breaking but I have checked the relevant repositories and none call
.getInstance()
(not surprising though given its limited usefulness, if any)