Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attribute error: 'MsSqlHook' object has no attribute 'get_conn_id' due to breaking changes made in a new release 3.8.0 of apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql library #41373

Open
1 of 2 tasks
Ishwin9 opened this issue Aug 10, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@Ishwin9
Copy link

Ishwin9 commented Aug 10, 2024

Apache Airflow Provider(s)

microsoft-mssql

Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql - 3.8.0

Apache Airflow version

2.7.3

Operating System

linux

Deployment

Astronomer

Deployment details

No response

What happened

We are getting attribute error 'MsSqlHook' object has no attribute 'get_conn_id' due to breaking changes made in a new release 3.8.0 of apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql library

What you think should happen instead

No response

How to reproduce

update apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql library to 3.8.0

Anything else

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@Ishwin9 Ishwin9 added area:providers kind:bug This is a clearly a bug needs-triage label for new issues that we didn't triage yet labels Aug 10, 2024
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Aug 10, 2024

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no need to wait for approval.

@Ishwin9
Copy link
Author

Ishwin9 commented Aug 10, 2024

image

@romsharon98
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like it been solved with this PR: #40615

@romsharon98 romsharon98 added provider:common-sql and removed needs-triage label for new issues that we didn't triage yet labels Aug 10, 2024
@Ishwin9
Copy link
Author

Ishwin9 commented Aug 10, 2024

I am not sure if this is same. I had to downgrade the provider to 3.7.2 version and it was successful after that. This seems like a new bug after the new release of this provider

@xy-qimu
Copy link

xy-qimu commented Nov 11, 2024

Has this problem been solved?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants