Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Java][FlightRPC] Flight SQL JDBC driver improvements #244

Open
2 tasks done
asfimport opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

[Java][FlightRPC] Flight SQL JDBC driver improvements #244

asfimport opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
Type: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@asfimport
Copy link

asfimport commented Sep 14, 2022

Follow ups for ARROW-7744

  • Rename internal classes to not imply everything is part of Flight RPC (e.g. ArrowFlightJdbcArray -> FieldVectorArray or similar)
  • Don't throw bare exceptions (always provide some error context)
  • Log a warning if the arrow-flight: URI scheme is used instead of arrow-flight-sql:
  • Create a documentation page (that can be used for people approaching this from the JDBC side, not necessarily Arrow users)
  • Document the connection string format and parameters
  • Replace // TODO comments with throw new UnsupportedOperationException()
  • Document how timestamp/time/date types are handled in converting between the two type schemas
  • Document the type conversions in general
  • timestamp handling is suspect
  • Upgrade to JUnit5/AssertJ instead of JUnit4/Hamcrest
  • Get rid of FreePortFinder
  • Use a single (static?) RootAllocator with child allocators
  • Remove all Guava usage (can we deny this with a lint?)
  • See if SqlTypes can be folded into arrow-jdbc

Reporter: David Li / @lidavidm

Subtasks:

Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-17729. Please see the migration documentation for further details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant