We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
Retrieve the value of the given union variant, or NULL if it's not currently selected This is will be used at apache/datafusion#11081
Describe the solution you'd like
A kernel in arrow_select with the following signature: fn union_extract(union_array: &UnionArray, field: &str) -> Result<ArrayRef>
arrow_select
fn union_extract(union_array: &UnionArray, field: &str) -> Result<ArrayRef>
Describe alternatives you've considered
Implement this in datafusion, but after comments from @samuelcolvin and @alamb at #6247 (comment) and #6247 (comment), I decided to do here
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
union_extract
I think this is needed for https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-functions-json
I will put it on my review queue
Sorry, something went wrong.
label_issue.py automatically added labels {'arrow'} from #6387
label_issue.py
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
Retrieve the value of the given union variant, or NULL if it's not currently selected
This is will be used at apache/datafusion#11081
Describe the solution you'd like
A kernel in
arrow_select
with the following signature:fn union_extract(union_array: &UnionArray, field: &str) -> Result<ArrayRef>
Describe alternatives you've considered
Implement this in datafusion, but after comments from @samuelcolvin and @alamb at #6247 (comment) and #6247 (comment), I decided to do here
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: