You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we may break ABI compatibility each minor version up
release ("Y" is increased in "X.Y.Z"), we should include
minor version into SO major version (100, 101 and 102 in the
following examples):
1.0.0 -> libarrow.100.0.0
1.1.0 -> libarrow.101.0.0
1.2.0 -> libarrow.102.0.0
If we don't break ABI compatibility each minor version up
release, we just use the same SO major version (100 in the
following examples) in 1.0.0:
Described by @kou on the mailing list:
If we may break ABI compatibility each minor version up
release ("Y" is increased in "X.Y.Z"), we should include
minor version into SO major version (100, 101 and 102 in the
following examples):
1.0.0 -> libarrow.100.0.0
1.1.0 -> libarrow.101.0.0
1.2.0 -> libarrow.102.0.0
If we don't break ABI compatibility each minor version up
release, we just use the same SO major version (100 in the
following examples) in 1.0.0:
1.0.0 -> libarrow.100.0.0
1.1.0 -> libarrow.100.1.0
1.2.0 -> libarrow.100.2.0
Reporter: Krisztian Szucs / @kszucs
Assignee: Krisztian Szucs / @kszucs
PRs and other links:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-5848. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: