-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Packaging][Conan] Clarification on "auto"option values in Conan recipe for Arrow C++ Library #40979
Comments
Thanks for working on this!
We can use
Should we support this work on the PR instead of here? Then we can close this issue and comment on the PR. |
Hi @kou! Thanks a lot for the response. Indeed, we can continue the conversation at conan-io/conan-center-index#23163, I see you already commented there. Thanks! |
Describe the usage question you have. Please include as many useful details as possible.
Hey Arrow Project Team!
My name is Dani, I'm a Conan developer working on the Conan recipe for the Arrow C++ library in at the Conan central repository https://github.com/conan-io/conan-center-index.
We've been streamlining the options management in the recipe as we have received some issues in the past, so we are aiming to make things simpler and more user-friendly. As part of this process, we've noticed some quirks with the "auto" values for certain options and we are hesitant about its behavior as we do not have a deep knowledge of the arrow cpp build intrinsics
For example, the options "with_jemalloc" has an auto behavior of setting its value to True on BSD systems. Making this option False by default now would cause any kind of trouble? Should it be True for such platform?
I would like to get some support in this way at the PR conan-io/conan-center-index#23163 were we are working on the changes, specficically regarding the confirmation of the following behaviors:
I have noticed that the conan recipe it is also included in this repository and updated from conan-center-index from time to time. For that reason as well we would like to align on this refactor of option to avoid creating any further trouble to anyone.
Thanks a bunch for your time and support.
Cheers!
Component(s)
C++
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: