Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

doc: document should fix version information #21

Closed
yjhjstz opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

doc: document should fix version information #21

yjhjstz opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement improvements on existing features

Comments

@yjhjstz
Copy link
Member

yjhjstz commented Sep 19, 2017

r28921之前：如果closewait_ms不会0，且还有请求在被处理，那么Server不会立刻关闭与client的连接，而是继续处理请求，同时对client发来的新请求立刻回复ELOGOFF错误以防止新请求加入，这个过程最多持续closewait_ms毫秒，之后Server会关闭所有连接并退出。

r28921之后：closewait_ms失效，不管它是什么值，server在退出时总会等待所有正在被处理的请求完成，同时对新请求立刻回复ELOGOFF错误。这么做的原因在于只要server退出时仍有处理线程运行，就有访问到已释放内存的风险。如果你的server“退不掉”，很有可能是由于某个检索线程hang住了，

under git version control , can you fix with git version instead of svn version?
many thanks.
@jamesge
Copy link
Contributor

jamesge commented Sep 19, 2017

Docs are being reviewed during translations to English. All SVN revision will be removed when the translations are done.

@jamesge jamesge closed this as completed Sep 19, 2017
@jamesge jamesge added the enhancement improvements on existing features label Sep 28, 2017
@feng-y feng-y mentioned this issue Feb 26, 2018
Closed
This was referenced Feb 27, 2020
Closed
Closed
@pluswu pluswu mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2021
Closed
@yqynju yqynju mentioned this issue Jul 16, 2021
Closed
@UncleWangNearBy UncleWangNearBy mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2021
Closed
@Flynn-Zh Flynn-Zh mentioned this issue Mar 31, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement improvements on existing features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@yjhjstz @jamesge