We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Catalog contains some versions 1.0.0 associated with some runtime artifacts:
camel-k-runtime-health: groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-runtime-health dependencies: - groupId: org.apache.camel artifactId: camel-servlet - groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-runtime-servlet camel-k-runtime-jvm: groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-runtime-jvm version: 1.0.0 dependencies: - groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-runtime-main - groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-loader-js - groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-loader-xml - groupId: org.apache.camel.k artifactId: camel-k-loader-java - groupId: org.apache.camel artifactId: camel-core-engine - groupId: org.apache.camel artifactId: camel-main - groupId: org.apache.camel artifactId: camel-properties
In this excerpt camel-k-runtime-health does not, but camel-k-runtime-jvm does.
camel-k-runtime-health
camel-k-runtime-jvm
I've noticed it with Knative. When running a Knative integration and describing the kit, the knative library gets version 1.0.0...
even if it's not using that actually, it's misleading
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed by apache/camel-k-runtime#157
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Catalog contains some versions 1.0.0 associated with some runtime artifacts:
In this excerpt
camel-k-runtime-health
does not, butcamel-k-runtime-jvm
does.I've noticed it with Knative. When running a Knative integration and describing the kit, the knative library gets version 1.0.0...
even if it's not using that actually, it's misleading
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: